![]() The 1959 172 and the 1960 172A panels held the same general shape, but most of the instruments were shifted to a shock panel that extended only from the left side to near the center. Most of the instruments were positioned above the control wheels, while radios were below the control yokes in the lower panel, and both the shock panel and plastic overlay were one piece and contained all instruments. ![]() The stationary panel was designed to be open around and above the yokes to allow for the various-sized instruments. An Overview of ModelsĮarly models of 172, from 1956 to 1958, took the design from earlier Cessna models, similar to the 170. This article has been made available to all website visitors. Most of our in-depth, detailed articles are for members only. A redesign of the aluminum shock panel can sometimes yield slightly better results, but owners will often find it nearly impossible to achieve the look they want without running into the stationary panel structure behind. It is the stationary panel that defines the layout of the instruments, not the outer layers of the instrument panel. Over the many years of Cessna 172 production, the stationary panel has been redesigned several times, which creates many different nonstandard layouts through the early years. It is a part of the aircraft’s structure and, according to the Cessna 172 service manual, considered not ordinarily removable due to being directly secured to engine mount stringers and a forward fuselage bulkhead. That structural piece is called the stationary panel. Instruments typically considered less sensitive, such as engine and temperature gauges, were often mounted directly to the structure behind the plastic. The shock panel is attached to the structure behind it using a set of rubber mounts, meant to isolate the sensitive instruments from the vibration of the aircraft. Once the plastic overlay was pulled off (or broken off due to age and wear), most of the instruments are contained in an aluminum panel known as the shock panel. The first was a plastic overlay, which revealed only the faces of the instruments and presented the pilot with a relatively pleasing and uncluttered view. The original instrument panel came in three parts. Diagram A – Example of typical stationary panel available area for Cessna 172 models from 1964 through 1976, with outlines of commonly requested avionics configurations.īut the reason for these nonstandard layouts might be more complex than some owners realize. When older models are purchased, owners often look at their jumbled instrument layout and consider how they can create that six-pack layout that they trained on. When compared to the 172N, P, R, and early S models, older models have nonstandard layouts that seem to lack symmetry and purpose. Modern Cessna 172s are equipped with impressive G1000 “Glass Cockpit” screens, but it is more likely that many pilots who learned in the Cessna 172 learned with “steam gauges” in a standard six-pack layout with a center radio stack. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.When was the last time you thought about why your instruments are arranged the way they are? Often the only time it is thought about is when a pilot is looking to upgrade their instruments or rearrange them to a more pleasing layout. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. ![]() This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |